Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: RE: fork on win95
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:41:34 +1000
Message-ID: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08F134@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: fork on win95
Thread-Index: AcEQq8fGt1iC4fQQQROD295aaSO0+wAAF8YQ
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id TAA06632

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 9:28 AM
> To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: fork on win95
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:53:31AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
> >
> >
> >> Hmm.  As I said, I actually tried my changes under Windows 95, so
> >> this will be difficult to track down, since I can't duplicate it.
> >
> >I'll see what sort of info I can generate for you, but I'm 
> still pleading
> >time shortage right now. I'll generate a strace as a minimum 
> (ie strace
> >sh -c ls) which should show the failure to fork(). Anything 
> else that might
> >spark neurons?
> >
> >> Thanks for not saying "It worked fine in B20.1", by the way.  :-)
> >
> >I forgot to mention that!. Doh!.
> 
> Jeez.  At the very *least* you could mention that fork works 
> fine for you
> on linux.  I need some reference point after all.
> 

See - telepathy works - you recieved that info!. Did you receive the
strace I just watched :].

As you've duplicated it I'll skip mailing you data for now - but if you
do want extra detail let me kknow.

Rob