Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 19:28:00 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: fork on win95
Message-ID: <20010719192800.B7237@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <005101c11036$06368800$806410ac AT local> <20010719112939 DOT A5093 AT redhat DOT com> <008001c1109d$40bca7e0$806410ac AT local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <008001c1109d$40bca7e0$806410ac@local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 07:53:31AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>
>
>> Hmm.  As I said, I actually tried my changes under Windows 95, so
>> this will be difficult to track down, since I can't duplicate it.
>
>I'll see what sort of info I can generate for you, but I'm still pleading
>time shortage right now. I'll generate a strace as a minimum (ie strace
>sh -c ls) which should show the failure to fork(). Anything else that might
>spark neurons?
>
>> Thanks for not saying "It worked fine in B20.1", by the way.  :-)
>
>I forgot to mention that!. Doh!.

Jeez.  At the very *least* you could mention that fork works fine for you
on linux.  I need some reference point after all.

cgf