Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Local Setup Cache MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:16:44 +1000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Local Setup Cache Thread-Index: AcEDZYBYqRl0xNPeRCKdIKX1z/ulNgAAHBwA From: "Robert Collins" To: Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id WAA01344 > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Vine [mailto:nhv AT cape DOT com] > > Robert Collins writes: > > > > FLTK sees to require a _lot_ more effort on the part of > the programmer, > >larger recreating the wheel. (ie handling a window resize > has to be done by > >hand). Whats the advantage of that wxWindows? > > did you see the resizable() method ? > Yes - the doco seemed to say that by default the resizeable() method isn't needed, that the bounding box of the outer window is determined by the window manager. > >If FTLK can do effective MDI-style windows under X, I'm > quite willing to > put > >in extra effort (wxWindows does that very poorly), but > otherwise I see > >little reason to spend time writing window management code > instead of .rc > >manipulation code. > > Hmm.. > maybe $FLTK_SRC / test / tile.cxx is what you want. > IMHO - This is a good demo of the resizable() method It's the MDI aspect I'm looking at, not the resizeable() per se. Can you comment on the testcase? What am I doing wrong? Rob > Cheers > > Norman > >