Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 12:54:11 EDT To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, Christopher Faylor , cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: Sample setup.ini X-Mailer: Virtual Access by Atlantic Coast PLC, http://www.atlantic-coast.com/va Message-Id: From: Brian Keener Reply-To: bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com In-Reply-To: <20010630153329.A16134@redhat.com> References: <000201c1014a$19cf53b0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com> <04c901c10160$4005e1a0$806410ac AT local> <20010630120243 DOT D12695 AT redhat DOT com> <20010630153329 DOT A16134 AT redhat DOT com> Christopher Faylor wrote: > If you check out the pre_category branch, you'll get a version of setup.exe > before Robert's category changes. The way I usually do this is: > > cd winsup > rsync -a cinstall/ precinstall > cd precinstall > cvs update -rpre_category > Michael Chase wrote: > The precinstall version doesn't have the rule necessary to accept multiple > categories for a package. I think that is one of the desired features the > upcoming version will provide. Okay, I'm confused now (playing catchup again). So people like me can keep up with this we now have two branches of cvs for cinstall - right? Chris' message seems to imply that precinstall is the version of setup that would be most like what we would get from the web page as an average user - without any of the new stuff but then Michael' message seems to imply that the new stuff is broken in the precinstall version. Which is it or where did my interpretation go goofy. Is it the *Pre*vious*Cinstall* or the *Pre*liminary*Cinstall*? bk