Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 00:17:52 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: Setup.exe 2.78.2.2 test satisfactory
Message-ID: <20010702001752.A20206@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <005f01c101e3$4471fed0$6464648a AT ca DOT boeing DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <005f01c101e3$4471fed0$6464648a@ca.boeing.com>; from mchase@ix.netcom.com on Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 09:06:47PM -0700

Anyone else tried this?

cgf

On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 09:06:47PM -0700, Michael A. Chase wrote:
>I just tried setup.exe 2.78.2.2 out with a local setup.ini that
>included multiple category: and requires: entries and worked fine.  It
>also pulled down a new setup.ini and handled it correctly as well.
>
>This looks good as an interim version so we can test the new version
>with real setup.ini files.