Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:23:57 EDT
To: cygwin-developers <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: Re: hierarchy in setup (category stuff)
X-Mailer: Virtual Access by Atlantic Coast PLC, http://www.atlantic-coast.com/va
Message-Id: <VA.00000842.01fd0b44@thesoftwaresource.com>
From: Brian Keener <bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com>
Reply-To: bkeener AT thesoftwaresource DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20010629114004.A6990@redhat.com>
References: <04e801c0faa2$f9008260$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010621222615 DOT C13746 AT redhat DOT com> <3B3324A7 DOT 49FFC98A AT yahoo DOT com> <054c01c0fbef$5f600e20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <06a001c0fc51$7a87e210$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20010629114004 DOT A6990 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >Still not 100%, but much cleaner and easier to read:
> >
> >Known bugs:
> >1) The partial view when you enter the package list has a scroll bar one
> >line too many long.
> >2) The category view always shows _all_ packages. There's no
> >category-partial view. Do we need one?
> 
> I just played with this and I like what I see.
> 
> I had a hard time getting all of the changes into the current CVS, though,
> and the view was sort of screwed up.

I have been battling with that this morning - I don't feel so bad if you had 
problems too - I think I must have gotten a patch or two out of or that fact I 
updated from cvs before trying the patches might have had a lot to do with it.

> Robert, if you are still interested, then I think that this is definitely the
> way to go.  If you have something worth checking in, then please do so.

That would be great Robert or if you have time I could use a patch file against 
the current cvs.  Actually right now, I'll settle for a copy of your choose.cc 
to use for a diff when I'm done cutting and pasting - meanwhile back to my 
cutting and pasting.

Thanks

bk