Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:26:15 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: hierarchy in setup (category stuff)
Message-ID: <20010621222615.C13746@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <04e801c0faa2$f9008260$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <04e801c0faa2$f9008260$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:39:02AM +1000

On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:39:02AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Well, I got a little time yesterday, and I've addded multiple categories
>to setup, and got the basic setup view showing:
>
>category  current new src name
>--------------------------------
>category
>           old   new   src  name
>           ...
>category 2
>           old   new   src  name
>
>I now have the following questions:
>
>1) Are there any other _inital_ actions for category other than
>expand/contract?

I thought that we could use "Exp/Skip/Reinstall/etc." eventually.

>2) I've got two views for categorys - full and normal as per the current
>layout. full shows all packages and categories. normal shows what the
>current "part" layout does. But categorised. Empty categorys show up
>with no children.

That's ok.

>3) What should the inital category view be - expanded or collapsed?

Collapsed?

>4) Should category should uncategorised packages appear as?
>"Uncategorised" seems singularly unappealing..

Misc?

cgf