Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:17:20 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Comments on Robert's category feature Message-ID: <20010620121720.A3129@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from robert.collins@itdomain.com.au on Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:33:55PM +1000 On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:33:55PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >BTW: I'm about 50% through to doing the updated screen Chris suggested. >I think that a third view, that selects the metapackages only will be >quite useful (ie show >Development >Workstation >Server >and just let the user choose one of those) but one thing at a time. I don't think that this view is useful. I forsee people installing the Workstation being confused by the lack of inetd due to a misunderstanding of the term Workstation. I don't think that we need something beyond a category level which shows generic things like "Development", "Shell", whatever. I think that some programs should live in more than one category, though. The current implementation doesn't allow that. I wonder if we should maintain a category array which points to a list of things in the category. cgf