Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:14:40 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bye bye //c?
Message-ID: <20010525111440.A24946@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010523155947 DOT A13690 AT redhat DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010523164806 DOT 0164b840 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20010524143332 DOT A9059 AT redhat DOT com> <3B0D7A24 DOT A7434D07 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010524184215 DOT E10453 AT redhat DOT com> <7865-Fri25May2001114533+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20010525102345 DOT D22907 AT redhat DOT com> <3663-Fri25May2001160428+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3663-Fri25May2001160428+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>; from starksb@ebi.ac.uk on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:04:28PM +0100

On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:04:28PM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>On Friday 25 May 01, Christopher Faylor writes:
>> >I can have a FAQ entry committed this weekend.  I've got a backlog of
>> >changes to make anyway, I'll try to get to all of them this weekend.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> I hope you are not going to add a "Use google to search for things"
>> entry.  I don't think that such an entry would be useful.
>
>I was going to refer to google as an alternative way to search the
>mailing list, with advice on search terms.  I won't, if you don't like
>that idea.

That's fine, I guess.  I don't think that actual URLs are helpful, but I
don't have that strong an opinion on it.  If you think they are then feel
free to overrule me.

cgf