Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 10:33:01 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Bye bye //c?
Message-ID: <20010525103301.I22907@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010523155947 DOT A13690 AT redhat DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010523164806 DOT 0164b840 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20010524143332 DOT A9059 AT redhat DOT com> <3B0D7A24 DOT A7434D07 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010524184215 DOT E10453 AT redhat DOT com> <7865-Fri25May2001114533+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20010525102345 DOT D22907 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010525102345.D22907@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:23:45AM -0400

On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:23:45AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 11:45:33AM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>>On Thursday 24 May 01, Christopher Faylor writes:
>>> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> >> 
>>> >> I guess at the very least, we should have a FAQ entry waiting for this
>>> >> problem.
>>
>>> The change has been made in CVS.  I am going to announce this sometime
>>> soon.
>>
>>I can have a FAQ entry committed this weekend.  I've got a backlog of
>>changes to make anyway, I'll try to get to all of them this weekend.
>
>Thanks.
>
>I hope you are not going to add a "Use google to search for things"
>entry.  I don't think that such an entry would be useful.

Let me amend this.  I guess it makes sense to add an entry about using
google to search.  I don't think that it makes sense to add specific
google URLs beyond http://www.google.com/ .

cgf