Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Reply-To: <nhv AT cape DOT com>
From: "Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: A cygwin mailing list experiment
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 09:05:29 -0400
Message-ID: <002e01c0d7bf$8f8ece00$a300a8c0@nhv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
In-reply-To: <20010508082052.G21710@redhat.com>
Importance: Normal

Christopher Faylor writes:
>
>It looks like I have things tuned well enough to accomodate the recent
>increases in activity.  I do think that there are procedural ways to
>deal with the problems in the list, though.
>
>Improving cygwin's documentation and making it available as a man or
>info page is one way.
>
>Weekly FAQ submissions is another.
>
>Standardized FAQ-like responses to repeated queries (e.g., "Why doesn't
>chmod work") is another.

Have you cosidered having a wiki based Cygwin FAQ

There are many but this is one of the better ones.
http://twiki.org/

Cheers

Norman Vine