Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010507132504.021044e0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 13:28:23 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: fix for pthread_broadcast In-Reply-To: <20010507131705.B27883@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 01:17 PM 5/7/2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 12:07:53PM -0500, Parker, Ron wrote: > >> I can't make any guarantees about 1.3.3 since I don't know exactly > >> how stable 1.3.2 will be. It would help if people would try snapshots > >> but of course no one does. > > > >Does anyone think that snapshots would see more usage if setup were able to > >download and install them? Would this be a worthwhile behavior? > >I guess I've always thought that if the simple act of downloading something, >uncompressing it, and copying it was too much for someone then the quality >of whatever bug reports they could come up with would be pretty pathetic. Actually, if someone were to invoke setup in this process, one only needs to download the DLL and then use setup to uncompress and put files in place, no? Still, I think Chris has a point, regardless of the mechanism used to get the snapshot. In any case, setup now should do everything "needed" except show the snapshots to the user. Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX