Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:27:44 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: "J. Johnston" <jjohnstn AT cygnus DOT com>
Cc: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com, "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>,
        newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: vfscanf in newlib
Message-ID: <20010420152744.A26175@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: "J. Johnston" <jjohnstn AT cygnus DOT com>,
	cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com,
	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>,
	newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <3ADD0441 DOT 91F76FB6 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3ADE1FC1 DOT F0A10A89 AT cygnus DOT com> <3ADE640A DOT 34E88DCE AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE040FC DOT 16BD67BC AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3AE070F3 DOT 1C45633A AT cygnus DOT com> <20010420145228 DOT B25768 AT redhat DOT com> <3AE0894D DOT 5288FDF3 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <3AE0894D.5288FDF3@cygnus.com>; from jjohnstn@cygnus.com on Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:09:01PM -0400

On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 03:09:01PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 01:25:07PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
>> >> Since the cygwin folks are about to release a new official kernel (1.3.0
>> >> this weekend) I'd like to get these changes into newlib quickly.  Other
>> >> than the tests promised above, what else do I need to do to facilitate
>> >> that?
>> >>
>> >
>> >You should try out the new patch.  The new patch adds a few new _r
>> >routines that should also be added to Cygwin which alters the Cygwin
>> >portion of your patch.
>> 
>> Chuck,
>> If you can submit the appropriate cygwin changes, I'll definitely get them
>> into 1.3.0.
>> 
>
>As discussed, I have attached the new patch.  I moved stuff around in stdio.h
>because there were multiple sections using the same #ifdef.  There were also
>some routines that were not properly under the non-strict ANSI flag.

I'm not sure if this is directed to me, but I was just asking Chuck for the
appropriate cygwin.din changes.

I decided that it was silly for me to ask him to do this since it is easy to
do myself, though, so I've made the appropriate modifications.  So, if/when you
check this in we'll be ready.

cgf