Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: bz2lib autoconfiguration ?? X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:27:38 +1000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: bz2lib autoconfiguration ?? Thread-Index: AcDId2qicPa7Ze+BQ6KskIBht6H83gAAEfmA From: "Robert Collins" To: "Cygwin Developers" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id WAA01413 AFAIK it's by design. Adding new subdirs with separate packages typically involves a new distribution. The --norecurse is to prevent changes to configure.[in|ac] at the top of a set of related packages forcing reconfiguration for the sub-packages. This has the side effect of not configuring added packages. Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com] > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 12:24 PM > To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: bz2lib autoconfiguration ?? > > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: > > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >> > > >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:13:55PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: > > >> >Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:07:43PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: > > >> >> >Hmm... > > >> >> > > > >> >> >make clean && make > > >> >> > > > >> >> >This doesn't create the configuration needed for > > >> >> >i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/bz2lib. :( > > >> >> > > >> >> Do you have the latest CVS version? > > >> > > > >> >Yes! > > >> > > >> And, you reconfigured? > > >> > > > > > >Hmm... No, I thought that that should happen via > dependency checking. > > >Makefile.in changes so reconfiguration should happen and > create the new > > >directory and perform configuration for it. > > > > > >I'm I just dreaming or is this the way it should happen? > > > > I don't know. The mechanism in winsup/Makefile.in is similar to > > a lot of Makefile.in's in the repository. They invoke > > > > config.status --recheck > > > > when configure changes. This will rerun configure but it > does so with > > the '--no-recursion' switch which seems to avoid creating new > > directories. > > > > I don't know if this is by accident or by design, though. > > > > Could you ask Alexandre? If not I'll see what I can find from the > autoconf archives. > > Earnie. > > > _________________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >