Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:12:55 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygdev Subject: Re: ANONYMOUS_STRUCT/UNION in w32api Message-ID: <20010418191255.A1770@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygdev References: <20010419005222 DOT X15005 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <20010419005222.X15005@cygbert.vinschen.de>; from vinschen@redhat.com on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:52:22AM +0200 On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:52:22AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >The latest change to w32api related to the ANONYMOUS_STRUCT and >ANONYMOUS_UNION problem breaks applications which doesn't include > but all needed header files separately. Each of the >affected files should be able to define that stuff by themselves. > >May I suggest creating a new header, say "anon.h", which contains >that stuff and is included by all affected files? Or, maybe it's >only at the wrong place and could be moved to, say winnt.h? Maybe we need something more generic. Linux has something like features.h but we obviously can't use that name. cgf