Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: RE: indent syntax
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:29:11 +1000
Message-ID: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF08EEDA@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
Thread-Topic: indent syntax
Thread-Index: AcDCEkf0EVAMWbbuRNizobKc6kT9RAAA6ZLg
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id VAA07542

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 07:51:53AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Corinna Vinschen" <vinschen AT redhat DOT com>
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 10:45:14PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >> > What indent syntax do you use for cygwin? I just noticed a huge
> >change
> >> > to the threads layout ..
> >> >
> >> > If you could let me know I'll use the same.
> >>
> >> We're using the GNU Coding Standard:
> >>
> >> http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_toc.html
> >>
> >> Corinna
> >>
> >
> >Well that leaves me confused. Indent is meant to default to the GNu
> >coding standards. So why did Chris commit a change to pthread.cc,
> >thread.cc, that moved every function definition to the left 
> hand border?
> >I'm indenting these files with indent foo.c (indent 2.2.5).
> 
> Because indent did not do the right thing in this case.  The 
> GNU coding
> standard says that functions and braces should start at the leftmost
> border.
> 
> I don't know if there is an option to indent which 
> accomodates c++ specifically
> or not, but I suspect that indent is confused by the extern "C" {
> stuff.
> 
> cgf
> 

Ah. I'll see what I can find for indent and C++. I'm not looking forward
to reformatting these source files by hand to fix indent's confusion.

Rob