Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:48:23 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: counting down to 1.3.0
Message-ID: <20010326144823.A9410@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <3ABF9007 DOT 3FB79B0B AT yahoo DOT com> <Pine DOT NEB DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10103261106440 DOT 20494-100000 AT cesium DOT clock DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.10.10103261106440.20494-100000@cesium.clock.org>; from matt@use.net on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:15:11AM -0800

On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:15:11AM -0800, Matt wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>>Is there anything else outstanding that I should know about?  The only
>>>thing that I am not sure about is the CYGWIN=title problem.  Looking at
>>>the code, I don't see why it should be failing but I don't exactly know
>>>how it used to work, so maybe it has either been broken for a while or
>>>it is working as designed.
>>>
>>>Does anyone use this option?  Can anyone verify that it is either
>>>broken or working?
>>
>>IIRC, you're problem was with W95 and also IIRC it always left the last
>>operation in the title when going to the command prompt.  It's been
>>more than two years since I last used Cygwin on W95.  I seem to recall
>>that the first occurrence of the window title changing was B19.  Is it
>>really worth an effort to change this?
>
>It still appears to be broken on my win98 machine.  It's only a minor
>annoyance, and shouldn't hold up a release in my opinion.  Perhaps it
>should be off by default if it doesn't work properly, since it probably
>just slows things down?
>
>My previous copy/paste message from before seemed to be ignored, and is
>really annoying in my opinion.  I tried to investigate this further,
>but couldn't really get anywhere using gdb.  Sorry I can't track things
>down further on this.  The original report is @
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/2001-03/msg00040.html

This is also something that you hve indicated has been broken since 1.1.6.

I didn't see that you debugged this.  It looks like attaching to the
hung process with gdb would be instructive.

cgf