Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:02:34 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: counting down to 1.3.0 Message-ID: <20010326140234.B27196@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010326125201 DOT A18870 AT redhat DOT com> <3ABF9007 DOT 3FB79B0B AT yahoo DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <3ABF9007.3FB79B0B@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:52:55PM -0500 On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:52:55PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> I think that we have addressed all of the problems that I know of with the >> current CVS version of cygwin. >> >> I'd like to have two things happen before I make a new release: >> >> 1) Corinna has some very minor changes to mmap to make things work >> better with new versions of gcc. >> >> 2) I'd like to resolve the newlib/cygwin pthreads issues and get >> Rober Collins' latest patches into cygwin. >> >> Is there anything else outstanding that I should know about? The only >> thing that I am not sure about is the CYGWIN=title problem. Looking at >> the code, I don't see why it should be failing but I don't exactly know >> how it used to work, so maybe it has either been broken for a while or >> it is working as designed. >> >> Does anyone use this option? Can anyone verify that it is either broken >> or working? >> > >IIRC, you're problem was with W95 and also IIRC it always left the last >operation in the title when going to the command prompt. It's been more >than two years since I last used Cygwin on W95. I seem to recall that >the first occurrence of the window title changing was B19. Is it really >worth an effort to change this? Yeah, it's hardly an important feature but I wanted to make sure that it hadn't suffered in this release. If it is the same as previous releases then... nevermind... cgf