Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: setup wishes -- any volunteers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4417.0
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:11:23 +1100
Message-ID: <EA18B9FA0FE4194AA2B4CDB91F73C0EF02E295@itdomain002.itdomain.net.au>
Thread-Topic: setup wishes -- any volunteers
Thread-Index: AcCzM0iZBmlIn2frSXyPRYKv0DAdLQAAonrw
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: <cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com>, <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id UAA17582

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 11:57 AM
> To: cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com; cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: setup wishes -- any volunteers
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 11:44:39AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >I don't understand this (as both formats are GPL'd AFAIK) 
> but I'm not in
> >the mood for bucking corporate reality just now... what RPM resources
> >are available at RedHat that might make my efforts on this easier?
> >(Read: I'm willing to try RPM, just not as enthusiastic).
> 
> Dunno.  I just don't want to be in a meeting where someone mentions
> the Cygwin setup utility and asks what package format it uses.  I
> could probably defend it by stating that it was contributed by a
> dedicated, selfless net contributor but I'd rather not have to.
> 
> Obviously dpkg is seen as a "competitor" to rpm and rpm is a Red Hat
> format, so...

Hmm... Are there any marketdroids listening in? Free as competition to
Free... cough, cough, diet coke went down the wrong way. 

Anyway as I said I'll give it a shot. 

> 
> This is one of those rare times where the fact that Cygwin is a
> corporate-sponsored entity makes a difference.
> 
> The last time it made a difference was where I was forced to delay
> a new net release for almost a year and a half for various silly
> reasons.
> 
> cgf
> 

A side-question: could volunteers have made a release during that period
(if they got their act together?)

Rob