Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:17:15 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: Christopher Faylor <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: State of the DLL, mark 2?
Message-ID: <20010320101715.K32706@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Christopher Faylor <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20010319203650 DOT A30559 AT redhat DOT com> <907012433 DOT 20010320162719 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010320091254 DOT F32706 AT redhat DOT com> <2710465067 DOT 20010320172451 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <2710465067.20010320172451@logos-m.ru>; from deo@logos-m.ru on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:24:51PM +0300

On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:24:51PM +0300, Egor Duda wrote:
>Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:24:51 +0300
>From: Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
>Reply-To: Egor Duda <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
>Organization: DEO
>To: Christopher Faylor <cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com>
>Subject: Re: State of the DLL, mark 2?
>In-reply-To: <20010320091254 DOT F32706 AT redhat DOT com>
>
>Hi!
>
>Tuesday, 20 March, 2001 Christopher Faylor cgf AT redhat DOT com wrote:
>
>CF> Btw, there are a lot of extra cruft that needs to be done to get this
>CF> working.  I am attaching a malloc object file that you can use.
>
>ah, that's where malloc_dbg() coming from.
>
>CF>    I  think  you  also  have  to  remove all malloc functions from
>CF> newlib's libc.a.
>
>can  you  give a little hint here? should i strip appropriate sections
>from libc.a or it's better to build newlib with -DMALLOC_PROVIDED ?

When I last did this, I removed all of the functions from libc.a with
ar.  I didn't know about -DMALLOC_PROVIDED.  It would probably work, though.

cgf