Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 18:40:00 +0300 From: Egor Duda X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.45) Personal Reply-To: Egor Duda Organization: DEO X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <38263457231.20010308184000@logos-m.ru> To: Egor Duda CC: Earnie Boyd Subject: Re: Outstanding issues with current DLL? In-reply-To: <119262998341.20010308183221@logos-m.ru> References: <20010307200848 DOT A32670 AT redhat DOT com> <20010307213711 DOT E32721 AT redhat DOT com> <3AA79E39 DOT BC915295 AT yahoo DOT com> <119262998341 DOT 20010308183221 AT logos-m DOT ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi! Thursday, 08 March, 2001 Egor Duda deo AT logos-m DOT ru wrote: >>> >Those around me always complain the release version of Cygwin >>> >DLL is updated too often, buggy and unstable. Please consider >>> >more careful release management. ED> i think separating 'stable' and 'development' branches can help a bit. ED> i don't know about Chris and Corinna and others, but speaking of ED> myself, i almost always can say, whether my patch is a bugfix and ED> should go to the stable branch or feature addition, and should go to ED> the development one. i understand that maintaining two branches and ED> merging changes is extra pain, and that fixing some bug may require ED> some major rewrite of signal or tty handling code, but, nevertheless, ^^^^ it'd be nice to have such branches in the cvs. Egor. mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19