Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 16:25:56 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Some "interesting" changes checked in
Message-ID: <20010306162556.F1732@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20010305013457 DOT A1344 AT redhat DOT com> <20010306140641 DOT D7734 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010306140641.D7734@cygbert.vinschen.de>; from vinschen@redhat.com on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:06:41PM +0100

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:06:41PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>The error is in suffix_scan::has. The order of the conditionals
>disallows .lnk suffixes for input files when in_suffixes is NULL.
>
>I have checked in a patch.

Thanks.  I had a hard time with that particular logic.  I'm still
not satisfied with it.  It seems to be scanning the suffix list
too often but I can't think of any way to avoid this.

Your patch is obviously correct, though.

I've redesigned suffix scanning almost as often as I've redesigned
signals.  And I still don't seem to have either quite right.  Sigh.

cgf