Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3A6F57E8.1EB71C33@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 17:32:08 -0500 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: Earnie Boyd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Earnie Boyd Subject: Re: Impressive timings. References: <3A6B290F DOT 644AE8C4 AT yahoo DOT com> <3A6F3440 DOT 4301D483 AT yahoo DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Earnie Boyd wrote: > > Earnie Boyd wrote: > > > > I've been rebuilding key packages with the newest libcygwin.a and I've > > just completed a build of the Cygwin runtime. Here is the timing: > > > > User time (seconds): 362.24 > > System time (seconds): 189.60 > > Percent of CPU this job got: 87% > > Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 10:29.40 > > > > I just rebuilt gcc-2.95.2-6 with the newest libcygwin.a. Here are the > new timings to rebuild Cygwin. > > User time (seconds): 187.91 > System time (seconds): 126.72 > Percent of CPU this job got: 69% > Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 7:35.73 > Oops. I miss stated the timings due to errors in the build. Rebuilding GCC with the new libcygwin.a didn't produce any difference. :( User time (seconds): 393.70 System time (seconds): 200.93 Percent of CPU this job got: 90% Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 10:55.52 Cheers, Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com