Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 23:26:39 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: some header bugs
Message-ID: <20010117232639.A16718@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200101180250 DOT VAA27333 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3A651023 DOT D8F0A461 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010117223459 DOT A16071 AT redhat DOT com> <200101180341 DOT WAA27702 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010117224907 DOT C16071 AT redhat DOT com> <200101180355 DOT WAA27821 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010117225837 DOT D16071 AT redhat DOT com> <200101180402 DOT XAA27891 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010117231405 DOT F16071 AT redhat DOT com> <20010117231750 DOT A16347 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To: <20010117231750.A16347@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:17:50PM -0500

On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:17:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:14:05PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:02:20PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>>
>>>> I guess we'll have to bow to bash as the authority and change it.  Should
>>>> it return 0 on success, -1 on error?
>>>
>>>It seems that way.  And set errno, too.
>>
>>Bleah.  It looks like our version of setdtablesize takes an argument which
>>is the amount to grow the fdtab by.  I found one use that assumed that
>>the argument was the total size for the table.
>>
>>It looks like bash wants this to be the total size, too.  Do you agree?
>
>Nevermind.  It's actually a cygwin *bug*.

I've checked in a fix.

cgf