Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:58:37 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: some header bugs Message-ID: <20010117225837.D16071@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <200101180153 DOT UAA26883 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010117205946 DOT A15347 AT redhat DOT com> <200101180250 DOT VAA27333 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3A651023 DOT D8F0A461 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010117223459 DOT A16071 AT redhat DOT com> <200101180341 DOT WAA27702 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010117224907 DOT C16071 AT redhat DOT com> <200101180355 DOT WAA27821 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <200101180355.WAA27821@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:55:08PM -0500 On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:55:08PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: >> By whose authority, though? Like Earnie, I can't find a valid >> declaration of setdtablesize anywhere. > >The only authority I could find is what bash is expecting of it. >Perhaps we shouldn't even provide it? It's really not needed anymore since cygwin, like I presume most other "UNIXes" auto-grows its fd table. But, who knows what it will screw up if we stop exporting it. I guess we'll have to bow to bash as the authority and change it. Should it return 0 on success, -1 on error? cgf