Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 22:49:07 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: some header bugs Message-ID: <20010117224907.C16071@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT cygwin DOT com References: <200101180153 DOT UAA26883 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20010117205946 DOT A15347 AT redhat DOT com> <200101180250 DOT VAA27333 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3A651023 DOT D8F0A461 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010117223459 DOT A16071 AT redhat DOT com> <200101180341 DOT WAA27702 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <200101180341.WAA27702@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:41:52PM -0500 On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:41:52PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: >> If we change the definition in unistd.h to void will that help bash? > >It's already void, which is wrong. It needs to be int, which means >cygwin has to return something useful. By whose authority, though? Like Earnie, I can't find a valid declaration of setdtablesize anywhere. cgf