Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:18:11 -0500
Message-Id: <200011061718.MAA30990@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: Jason DOT Tishler AT dothill DOT com
CC: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-reply-to: <20001106115142.L196@dothill.com> (message from Jason Tishler on
	Mon, 6 Nov 2000 11:51:42 -0500)
Subject: Re: setup.exe cygdrive patch
References: <20001106090434 DOT G196 AT dothill DOT com> <20001106111342 DOT B1289 AT redhat DOT com> <20001106115142 DOT L196 AT dothill DOT com>


> Should I have broken the patch into two pieces?

If Chris hadn't approved the cygwin parts, I would have done it
myself.  But, the two parts *could* have been done as two patches,
with one dependent on the other.  Or not.  Doesn't matter, really.

The important thing is that you *did* something - we're not going to
complain when people help out!