Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 11:07:21 -0400
To: cygwin developers <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: 1.1.4 vs 1.1.5 timings
Message-ID: <20001017110721.A9296@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin developers <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <20001017122956 DOT 21318 DOT qmail AT web106 DOT yahoomail DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <20001017122956.21318.qmail@web106.yahoomail.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 05:29:56AM -0700

On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 05:29:56AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>It appears that 1.1.5 wins in that it's using less resources.  The make has a
>larger "Elapsed" time because it got less of the CPU.

That's what I've been seeing too.  I think that 1.1.5 is blocking somewhere, either
on a WaitFor* function or a read.  I really want to figure out why this is happening.

I assume that this is with a recently updated version of cygwin, right?  There were
some changes to resource accounting (cpu time) in the recent snapshots.

cgf