Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <20001017122956.21318.qmail@web106.yahoomail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 05:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: 1.1.4 vs 1.1.5 timings
To: cygwin developers <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

As promised I have timings for the make clean and make processes:

/tmp/make-clean-1.1.4.timing
        Command being timed: "make clean"
        User time (seconds): 17.49
        System time (seconds): 16.80
        Percent of CPU this job got: 21%
        Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 2:38.89

/tmp/make-clean-1.1.5.timing
        Command being timed: "make clean"
        User time (seconds): 10.91
        System time (seconds): 12.58
        Percent of CPU this job got: 21%
        Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 1:48.88

/tmp/make-1.1.4.timing
        Command being timed: "make"
        User time (seconds): 548.72
        System time (seconds): 587.28
        Percent of CPU this job got: 65%
        Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 28:47.32

/tmp/make-1.1.5.timing
        Command being timed: "make"
        User time (seconds): 495.05
        System time (seconds): 558.23
        Percent of CPU this job got: 55%
        Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss): 31:38.83

It appears that 1.1.5 wins in that it's using less resources.  The make has a
larger "Elapsed" time because it got less of the CPU.

Cheers,

=====
Earnie Boyd
mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com

---         <http://earniesystems.safeshopper.com>         ---
--- Cygwin: POSIX on Windows <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/> ---
---   Minimalist GNU for Windows <http://www.mingw.org/>   ---

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf!  It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/