Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 12:35:56 -0400 From: Chris Faylor To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: Added cygwin-cvs to http://www.cygwin.com/lists.html Message-ID: <20001006123556.H3094@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <20001006111250 DOT 28747 DOT qmail AT web113 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20001006123008 DOT F3094 AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <20001006123008.F3094@cygnus.com>; from cgf@cygnus.com on Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:30:08PM -0400 On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:30:08PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:12:50AM -0700, Earnie Boyd wrote: >>--- Chris Faylor wrote: >>> I realized that we were doing a pretty good job of hiding what could >>> be an interesting list (if you're a cygwin developer) so I added the >>> link to the URL in the subject. >>> >>> Any bets on how long it will take before it receives some spam? I don't >>> think there is anything other than ORBS blocks in place, currently. >> >>I found newlib's cvs list which isn't listed either. Is there one for >>libiberty? > >Nope. It might be part of gcc's cvs, though. Busted! I didn't read the whole thread and missed DJ's earlier identical answer. cgf (hangs his head in shame)