Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:24:19 -0400
To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: weird mount/ls behaviour
Message-ID: <20000914172419.A24259@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References: <00a801c01e93$d6fe7500$3327f0d8 AT lag DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <00a801c01e93$d6fe7500$3327f0d8@lag.net>; from matt@use.net on Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:36:27PM -0700

On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:36:27PM -0700, Matt wrote:
>mount never seems to return an error if it can't qualify the win32
>path supplied.

Correct.  It never has and it is not intended to do so, AFAIK.

cgf