Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:09:32 -0400
Message-Id: <200009141509.LAA04701@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk
CC: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-reply-to: <8773-Thu14Sep2000153640+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> (message from
	David Starks-Browning on Thu, 14 Sep 2000 15:36:40 +0100)
Subject: Re: path bug in cygcheck?
References: <1341-Thu14Sep2000140817+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <8773-Thu14Sep2000153640+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>


> I would say this is a defect, albeit a minor one, and perhaps not
> worth fixing.

In cygcheck, *all* bugs are worth fixing.  This is one of the few
programs that absolutely *must* do the right thing, because we use it
to diagnose user problems.