Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:11:11 -0400
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To: Chris Faylor <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: sigframe inlining
Message-ID: <20000907231111.A715@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faylor <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <1975989842 DOT 20000901235524 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20000901160904 DOT A29015 AT cygnus DOT com> <1137440989 DOT 20000902001935 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20000901163248 DOT A29171 AT cygnus DOT com> <1958635367 DOT 20000902003930 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20000901205807 DOT A32178 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000901211953 DOT A32424 AT cygnus DOT com> <11977784207 DOT 20000902195159 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20000903005142 DOT A15751 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <20000903005142.A15751@cygnus.com>; from cgf@cygnus.com on Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 12:51:42AM -0400

On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 12:51:42AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 07:51:59PM +0400, Egor Duda wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>Saturday, 02 September, 2000 Chris Faylor cgf AT cygnus DOT com wrote:
>>
>>>>I've duplicated the problem. A test case is below.
>>>>
>>>>I'll look into this.
>>
>>CF> I've checked in a fix.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>today i've got another bug, when i've compiled cygwin without -O2 flag
>>since   gcc   stops   inining   class   sigframe   member   functions,
>>__builtin_frame_address   got   wrong  stack  offset.  this  leads  to
>>api_fatal in signal handler. how about this patch?
>>
>>Egor.          mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19
>
>Yeah, I knew about this problem and have studiously avoided compiling
>sigframe functions without optimization.  I wish there was some way to
>force inlining no matter what.
>
>I guess we'll probably have to go with something like this eventually
>but I'd like to ruminate on it for a while first.

I've checked in a patch that, I think, accomplishes the same thing
without the use of additional macros.

cgf