Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 00:51:42 -0400
To: Chris Faylor <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: sigframe inlining
Message-ID: <20000903005142.A15751@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faylor <cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References: <1975989842 DOT 20000901235524 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20000901160904 DOT A29015 AT cygnus DOT com> <1137440989 DOT 20000902001935 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20000901163248 DOT A29171 AT cygnus DOT com> <1958635367 DOT 20000902003930 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20000901205807 DOT A32178 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000901211953 DOT A32424 AT cygnus DOT com> <11977784207 DOT 20000902195159 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <11977784207.20000902195159@logos-m.ru>; from deo@logos-m.ru on Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 07:51:59PM +0400

On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 07:51:59PM +0400, Egor Duda wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Saturday, 02 September, 2000 Chris Faylor cgf AT cygnus DOT com wrote:
>
>>>I've duplicated the problem. A test case is below.
>>>
>>>I'll look into this.
>
>CF> I've checked in a fix.
>
>Thanks!
>
>today i've got another bug, when i've compiled cygwin without -O2 flag
>since   gcc   stops   inining   class   sigframe   member   functions,
>__builtin_frame_address   got   wrong  stack  offset.  this  leads  to
>api_fatal in signal handler. how about this patch?
>
>Egor.          mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19

Yeah, I knew about this problem and have studiously avoided compiling
sigframe functions without optimization.  I wish there was some way to
force inlining no matter what.

I guess we'll probably have to go with something like this eventually
but I'd like to ruminate on it for a while first.

cgf