Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 08:53:24 -0400
Message-Id: <200009011253.IAA17108@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: deo AT logos-m DOT ru
CC: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-reply-to: <106339243866.20000901110237@logos-m.ru> (message from Egor Duda
	on Fri, 1 Sep 2000 11:02:37 +0400)
Subject: Re: testsuite
References: <20000831165024 DOT A15210 AT cygnus DOT com>
 <200008312055 DOT QAA25395 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000831170237 DOT B15144 AT cygnus DOT com>
 <200008312122 DOT RAA25605 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <106339243866 DOT 20000901110237 AT logos-m DOT ru>


> DD> You don't need Makefiles all over the testsuite.  In fact, there are
> DD> *no* makefiles in the existing cygwin testsuite.
> 
> yes,  because  all  needed  support is built as part of winsup/cygwin/
> build.  but  now i need to build yet another support lib. the question

I didn't say you *couldn't* have a Makefile.  I just said they weren't
required.  Certainly, if you need to do some pre-builds for "make
check", go ahead and add a Makefile and hook it into winsup's "make
check" rule (which doesn't yet exist).