Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:50:32 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: setup versioning Message-ID: <20000802165031.B2905@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <200008022040 DOT QAA23436 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i In-Reply-To: <200008022040.QAA23436@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 04:40:59PM -0400 On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 04:40:59PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > >I was just thinking that the CVS revision of "ChangeLog" might be a >good automatic version number for setup (aside from the fact that it's >1.x instead of 2.x, but I can fix that). > >Another thought is to auto-tag all the source files, and provide a >dialog that shows them all, for troubleshooting purposes. A grep or >sed could be used to build a .h from all the *.c keywords in their >comments. > >Comments? The "old" setup.exe just used a $Revision$ tag in setup.c as well as time and date. cgf