Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:34:02 -0400 Message-Id: <200007271434.KAA23364@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com In-reply-to: <20000727102236.A24351@cygnus.com> (message from Chris Faylor on Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:22:36 -0400) Subject: Re: sample setup "version chooser" References: <200007250153 DOT VAA10202 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000725223226 DOT D3868 AT cygnus DOT com> <200007261339 DOT JAA17361 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000726100359 DOT A7206 AT cygnus DOT com> <200007271339 DOT JAA21869 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000727095107 DOT A13046 AT cygnus DOT com> <200007271359 DOT JAA22730 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000727102236 DOT A24351 AT cygnus DOT com> > >Ok. I think that setup should still warn if the user tries to not > >install something that we have deemed to be part of the complete > >package, though. > > That doesn't mean that the stuff is "mandatory". I just wanted to > give someone pause if they decided not to download those packages. How about just a tag on the chooser that says if the package is recommended or not? So far, we'd have the following tags for installability: action: require recommend install skip > Maybe this is a round tuit feature if we see massive confusion on > the cygwin mailing list. Could be.