Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:59:22 -0400
Message-Id: <200007271359.JAA22730@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-reply-to: <20000727095107.A13046@cygnus.com> (message from Chris Faylor on
	Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:51:07 -0400)
Subject: Re: sample setup "version chooser"
References: <200007250153 DOT VAA10202 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000725223226 DOT D3868 AT cygnus DOT com> <200007261339 DOT JAA17361 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000726100359 DOT A7206 AT cygnus DOT com> <200007271339 DOT JAA21869 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20000727095107 DOT A13046 AT cygnus DOT com>


> fileutils, shellutils, ash, and bash are the only ones I notice in
> the current latest.  I think that fileutils and shellutils are
> particularly problematic since it is not obvious what they contain.

But, *mandatory*?  Even RH's GNUpro customers don't install those
unless they're actually rebuilding the tools.

You yourself don't use bash ;-)