Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 15:04:50 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Subject: Re: login-1.3 can't work on the recent snapshots. Message-ID: <20000719150450.C18820@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sources DOT redhat DOT com References: <20000719141458 DOT D17938 AT cygnus DOT com> <3975FB88 DOT 5A96123E AT cygnus DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3975FB88.5A96123E@cygnus.com>; from vinschen@cygnus.com on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 09:03:36PM +0200 On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 09:03:36PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >Chris Faylor wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 01:36:17AM +0900, Kazuhiro Fujieda wrote: >> >>>> On 05 Jul 2000 23:28:46 +0900 >> >>>> Kazuhiro Fujieda said: >> > >> >> The login-1.3 of the net release seem not to work with the >> >> recent snapshots. I tested it with inetutils-1.3.2-4 under >> >> WinNT4 Sp6a and the latest snapshot. >> >> >> >> When I connected with in.telnetd, I was able to find the >> >> following message. But I couldn't start the remote session, >> >> because bash.exe spawned by login.exe was choked by the system >> >> error of "The application failed to initialize properly (0xc0000022).". >> > >> >I managed to find the cause of this problem. >> > >> >spawn_guts can modify values referred by `child', even though >> >there is a case where `child' == `myself'. >> >> Is this when spawn_guts is called to 'exec[lv]p?()' something? > >I don't understand then, why my impersonation stuff works at all. >All typical applications using that technique are using exec(), >not spawn(). > >login-1.3 is still using `sexec..()' of course. I'm not sure why it is a problem even for when child == myself, actually. cgf