Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:27:01 -0400
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: Cygdrive Path Prefix Patch Issue
Message-ID: <20000623132701.A2868@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References: <20000615150243 DOT 27071 DOT qmail AT web116 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <20000615123531 DOT F5388 AT cygnus DOT com> <395395CE DOT 661F12B8 AT dothill DOT com> <200006231704 DOT NAA09270 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <39539BC6 DOT 4BF780B8 AT dothill DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <39539BC6.4BF780B8@dothill.com>; from Jason.Tishler@dothill.com on Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 01:17:58PM -0400

On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 01:17:58PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>DJ,
>
>DJ Delorie wrote:
>> 
>> > Does anyone object to the name cygwin_get_cygdrive_prefixes?  Or, to
>> > be more explicit, adding the following declaration to sys/mount.h:
>> >
>> >     int cygwin_get_cygdrive_prefixes (char *user, char *system);
>> 
>> Is there a good reason not to use the existing cygwin_internal()
>> function for this?  It's clearly an internal function, only used by
>> mount.
>
>Sorry, I forgot about your previous suggestion about using
>cygwin_internal() and was just continuing in the direction that
>Earnie and Chris seemed to be pointing me.
>
>I just reviewed the cygwin_internal() related source and would prefer
>this solution.  Do others concur?

Yes.

cgf