Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 22:34:06 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Eliminating usr/i686-pc-cygwin Message-ID: <20000606223406.A3865@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i I've been perfecting my "mknetrel" script to the point where it is now easy to eliminate the i686-pc-cygwin directory. We've talked about doing this in the past and even, I think, decided that we would do this for the next net release but we never did this. I'm ready to make a cygwin release but I'd like to also make this change. I can think of a few ways to do this. 1) Setup.exe can issue a warning if it sees this directory, and do nothing. 2) Setup.exe can issue a warning, and move the directory out of the way. 3) Setup.exe can issue a warning, and remove the directory. 4) Setup.exe can do 2) or 3) and do a: 'ln -s usr i686-pc-cygwin'. I'm probably partial to 2. The rationale for doing this is that some (broken?) configurators look in /usr/include for specific header files and get confused when they don't find anything there. This will probably cause some pain in the short run but I think it is worth it to make things look more like a normal UNIX system. Thoughts? cgf