Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <20000522214209.15985.qmail@web120.yahoomail.com> Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 14:42:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com Subject: Re: Next net release will be 1.1.3 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Chris Faylor wrote: > It makes sense to "increment by two" for each net release. This means > that if someone downloads a snapshot (which will be something like > 1.1.2, 1.1.4, etc.) they'll be able to upload to 1.1.3, 1.1.5, etc. > > The only slight inconsistency in this plan is that it is the opposite of > the "stable releases are even, beta net releases are odd". Since it's > likely that few people besides DJ and I are aware of this even/odd > relationship, I'm wondering if this is a big deal. > I don't think this is a big deal. However, this makes the next major net release need to be 1.2.1, which isn't a big deal either it's just semantics. > If so, I guess the next net release will be 1.1.4. > Probably should just do this just for the semantics. Cheers, ===== --- Earnie Boyd: __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__ Cygwin Newbies: __Minimalist GNU for Windows__ Mingw32 List: Mingw Home: __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/