Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 14:10:31 -0400
Message-Id: <200005181810.OAA25203@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
In-reply-to: <20000518135101.A14123@cygnus.com> (message from Chris Faylor on
	Thu, 18 May 2000 13:51:01 -0400)
Subject: Re: Can't build the latest snapshot with gcc-2.95.2-1.
References: <s1sr9azhmx6 DOT fsf AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp> <20000518135101 DOT A14123 AT cygnus DOT com>


> Hmm.  Corinna saw this too but neither DJ or I see this.  Is this
> from a completely clean build?

I don't use gcc 2.95.2-1 either, so that might be why I don't see it.
Switching my NT box over to rely entirely on the net distribution is
probably going to wait until we have some form of "mixed" mount (read
text, write binary) as all my files are text at the moment, and I've
got dozens of build areas I pull binaries from.