Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: "Paul K. Fisher" <pfisher AT plexware DOT com>
To: <cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: RE: Reason for cover functions in pthread.cc
Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 20:04:05 -0500
Message-ID: <000701bfb952$78bca8f0$6401a8c0@jupiter>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <20000508115052.K13670@cygnus.com>

> From: Chris Faylor, Monday, May 08, 2000 10:51 AM
>
> On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 10:43:31PM -0500, Paul K. Fisher wrote:
> >Is there a reason to keep the cover functions in pthread.cc?
>
> I don't know of any reason for this practice.  It has
> always mystified me.  Do things __pthread_attr_init
> exist in the spec?
No, not that I can see.  These are simply gratuitous.  I'll remove them in
my next patch.

paul