Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 15:07:23 -0400 To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: Two complaints about lack of massive setup.exe Message-ID: <20000422150723.A32001@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <20000422121346 DOT A1589 AT cygnus DOT com> <015201bfac90$b65bc980$3327f0d8 AT lag DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i In-Reply-To: <015201bfac90$b65bc980$3327f0d8@lag.net>; from matt@use.net on Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 12:26:52PM -0700 On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 12:26:52PM -0700, Matt wrote: >>We've had two complaints that people miss the old setup.exe that worked >>"so well". >> >>It would be pretty trivial (thanks to Ron's excellent design) to have >>the current setup.exe pull in all of the non-source tar files and >>extract them. It would be a huge binary, but if that's what people >>what... > >I think we should keep it approximately the way it is, except maybe put >all the packages in one subdir of /latest (like /latest/packages). >This new scheme allows us to do some neat stuff later (like getting >only updated packages). I wasn't talking about supplanting the new method, I was offering additional methods for downloading packages. We could provide a packages and sources directory in latest which just had symbolic links to the stuff in the subdirectories, I suppose. cgf