Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <015201bfac90$b65bc980$3327f0d8@lag.net> From: "Matt" To: References: <20000422121346 DOT A1589 AT cygnus DOT com> Subject: Re: Two complaints about lack of massive setup.exe Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 12:26:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 > We've had two complaints that people miss the old setup.exe that worked > "so well". > > It would be pretty trivial (thanks to Ron's excellent design) to have > the current setup.exe pull in all of the non-source tar files and > extract them. It would be a huge binary, but if that's what people > what... I think we should keep it approximately the way it is, except maybe put all the packages in one subdir of /latest (like /latest/packages). This new scheme allows us to do some neat stuff later (like getting only updated packages).