Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:34:51 -0500
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: net release/installer status?
Message-ID: <20000328193451.E29798@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cgf AT cygnus DOT com, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References: <38E01318 DOT 5EA4BD9 AT vinschen DOT de> <200003280434 DOT WAA18089 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu> <20000327234123 DOT A26568 AT cygnus DOT com> <38E0DB8E DOT 4FF8B722 AT vinschen DOT de> <38E11B75 DOT 628299A AT vinschen DOT de> <20000328174122 DOT A29443 AT cygnus DOT com> <38E1427B DOT FF29F78F AT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.8i
In-Reply-To: <38E1427B.FF29F78F@vinschen.de>; from corinna@vinschen.de on Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:38:35AM +0200

On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:38:35AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> This needs to be there in case somebody has an older winsup directory.
>> I guess this needs to be added there.  If this works, would you
>> check it into sourceware?
>
>Would you please first look into the patch file that is attached to my
>mail from 0:29am? Those patches have allowed to build everything in one
>go. The patch of winsup/cygwin/Makefile.in result in a cvs conflict in
>the meantime but that is easy to solve.

I didn't save the mail.  If you replaced a -L then it is wrong.  If you
added a -Lwhatever/w32api/lib then it's correct.

>> Also, can we simplify the DLL creation now using the newer linker?
>
>Umm, I don't know. I'm happy for today to have the cross build working
>anyway.

That was more of a question for Mumit.

cgf