Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-developers-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin-developers/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <38C44516.2D056914@vinschen.de>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 00:53:58 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna AT vinschen DOT de>
Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: de,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject: Re: Changing cygwin-developers "charter"?
References: <E12S3kI-0000bp-00 AT mx02 DOT kundenserver DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Parker, Ron" wrote:
> [...]
> How about a cygwin-ports list? It could possibly replace the cygwin-xfree
> list.

The developers list should remain the forum of the core developers.

I agree to a cygwin-porters list. The charter should emphasize it's
goal to support discussions of porting GPL'ed software.

IMHO, the xfree list should stay alive. The current traffic maybe low
but that could change with the existance of more stable servers.

Corinna