Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Message-ID: <20000306201710.4560.qmail@web109.yahoomail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 12:17:10 -0800 (PST) From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com Subject: Re: Changing cygwin-developers "charter"? To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- Eric Christopher wrote: > > > Personally, I am happy with the status quo here but I was wondering > > if anyone else felt that we should open this up for discussions of > > things like bfd/binutils/gcc, etc. > > > > I wouldn't mind it being a discussion list for people developing ports > for cygwin. More of a people developing the cygwin env. as opposed to > people developing with cygwin. Make sense? > The reason cygwin-developers exists was to help focus the discussion to the Cygwin POSIX library only and the libraries needed to support it. I don't really think that this should change. Perhaps a cygwin-packages would be more beneficial for the porting of tools discussions between maintainers of packages. I would think that this would require some formal method of "this person is maintaining the cygwin port for this package" database and all modifications would then be approved by that maintainer. BTW: I don't think that discussions of a netrelease should be considered off-topic for cygwin-developers until cygwin-packages is created; but, afterward that discussion should happen there. ===== --- Earnie Boyd: __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__ Cygwin Newbies: __Minimalist GNU for Windows__ Mingw32 List: Mingw Home: __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com