Mailing-List: contact cygwin-developers-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-developers-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: Chris Faylor Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:00:35 -0500 To: DJ Delorie Cc: fujieda AT jaist DOT ac DOT jp, cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com Subject: Re: next net release preview Message-ID: <20000228150035.A22135@cygnus.com> Reply-To: cygwin-developers AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com References: <200002232151 DOT QAA14479 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <200002281946 DOT OAA18911 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.4i In-Reply-To: <200002281946.OAA18911@envy.delorie.com>; from dj@delorie.com on Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 02:46:11PM -0500 On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 02:46:11PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> Neverthless, I hope that Cygnus/Red Hat defines definitely the >> reasonable policy about packages, such as the prefix directory, >> the host type name (i686-pc-cygwin32 or i686-pc-cygwin ?), and >> so on. > >What's in the preview doesn't meet all the goals I'd like. I'm >hoping that new packages would be: > > i686-pc-cygwin > --prefix=/usr > >The target was discussed in a past thread; I don't recall about the >prefix. I've been discussing this with Mumit in private email. He's got some ideas about this. cgf